Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 40

Bitcoin Price Story: Holds Support Above $60K

0
Bitcoin Price Story: Holds Support Above $60K

Bitcoin (BTC) is breaking above a short-term downtrend, which could support further upside toward the $65,000 resistance level. The all-time high around $66,900 is also within reach, although buyers struggled to sustain that level last week.

BTC has whipsawed over the past few days, which created choppy trading conditions. This is typical during a consolidation phase, especially after a near-50% price rally over the past month.

As of press time the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization was changing hands around $62,500, up 2.4% over the past 24 hours.

The relative strength index (RSI) on the daily chart is rising from neutral levels, which means the pullback in BTC’s price is starting to stabilize. However, the weekly RSI is approaching overbought levels, which typically precedes a pullback in price.

Overall, upside momentum is improving with seasonal strength in the fourth quarter. A confirmed breakout (two consecutive daily closes) above the all-time high would yield a measured move projection toward $86,000. On the other hand, an immediate price pullback could be limited around the $53,000 support level.

Advertisement

Ubisoft is investing in blockchain games

0
Ubisoft is investing in blockchain games

Popularly known for creating the Assassin’s Creed franchise, and arguably one of the world’s biggest video game companies, Ubisoft has hosted its Q2 earnings call this week, where it discussed blockchain as a key topic.

Now, despite reporting a 15% rise in unique active players for the first half of the year — in comparison with 2020, and also coupled with the fact that Assassin’s Creed Valhalla went on to become the second most profitable game in the history of the company, the French firm’s CEO, Yves Guillemot, has now shared his plans of investing in blockchain-centric gaming companies on the platform.

But even after making notable progress in the space — including the funding of Animoca Brands — Guillemot insists that the platform is still in its early stage of research and development.

In April, Ubisoft became a validator node on the Tezos network. Then by July, it became a channel node operator on the Aleph.im network, and a pioneering member of Blockchain Game Alliance.

Speaking about the potential impacts that blockchain technology could have on the gaming industry, the Chief Financial Officer of Ubisoft, Frédérick Duguet says it will enable more play-to-earn, thereby allowing more players to actually earn content, as well as own content. Also thinking about the long term, the CFO is confident that the blockchain  will help the growth of the industry as they already have some knowledge, from working with other smaller companies going on blockchain.

Recall that recently, Valve was in the headlines for banning all crypto, blockchain and nonfungible token (NFT) games and content from its Steam marketplace.

In the wake of the ban however,  digital advocacy group, Fight for the Future — with the support of the Blockchain Game Alliance, Enjin and 26 other blockchain game projects — published an open letter calling for the corporation to pivot on its decision, stating that decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and NFTs can undoubtedly help foster the advancement of decentralized, interactive, democratic, and player focused systems.

Advertisement

Netflix’s Squid Game Token With Red Flags

0
Netflix's Squid Game Token With Red Flags

A token promoted as a play-to-earn token by the name squid game (SQUID) is getting the attention of the cryptoverse and mainstream media, after seeing a continuous, and rather unnatural, rise in price since its launch earlier this week. However, a quick look at the token’s website brings multiple red flags, while at least one company from their partner’s list denied the partnership.

After going live on Binance Chain’s PancakeSwap decentralized exchange (DEX) at a price of USD 0.01 on October 26, SQUID was at the time of writing (14:24 UTC) trading at USD 7.55, up more than 45,000% since its inception.

Over the past 24 hours, the price was up 222%, with the number continuously moving higher. The 24-hour trading volume surpassed USD 9m, per CoinMarketCap data.

Unfortunately for buyers, there is a problem with the token, seemingly inspired by the Korean drama series Squid Game on Netflix, with several users reporting that it is impossible to sell it on PancakeSwap.

Not surprisingly, the situation may become a major deal-breaker for token holders, given that PancakeSwap is the only market where the token is traded at the moment.

“We have received multiple reports that users are not able to sell this token in PancakeSwap. Please exercise caution while trading,” the major coin tracking website CoinMarketCap warns its users on the token’s page, adding that “This project, while clearly inspired by the Netflix show of the same name, is unlikely to be affiliated with the official IP.”

Meanwhile, not being able to sell the token would also explain why the price has only moved in one direction – up!

SQUID price since inception:

Source: CoinMarketCap

Judging from the project’s website, the SQUID token and the related game is likely a scam, with key team members listed as “CEO”, “CMO”, and “CTO” nowhere to be found online or on social media.

Source: A screenshot of the token’s website

Further, the project’s website claims that it has a “partnership” with Netflix, MicrosoftCoinGecko, and several other well-known brands, which there is no evidence to support.

Source: A screenshot of the token’s website

CoinGecko told Cryptonews.com that they have no partnership with this project. We have contacted Netflix for comment too.

According to the project’s white paper, the squid token has “an innovative anti-dump mechanism” built into it that prevents the price from dropping, with “selling credits” necessary to obtain in order to sell tokens.

And for those wondering why other liquidity pools have not been set up for token holders to sell, the white paper answers that too:

“Only SQUID-BNB in PancakeSwap is officially supported, which means you can only choose to swap SQUID for BNB in PancakeSwap. Users who add any other liquidity pairs will be punished.”

The SQUID token is allegedly based on six online games, all with the goal of winning prize money.

Worth noting is that all of the online games require players to pay “entry fees.” At current SQUID prices, these fees can add up to rather substantial amounts, with 15,000 SQUID, worth more than USD 107,000, necessary to enter Level 6 of the game.

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s Challenge, Leveraged Bitcoin Futures ETF Can Be Next for Valkyrie?

0
Bitcoin's Challenge, Leveraged Bitcoin Futures ETF Can Be Next for Valkyrie?

After hitting an all-time high last week above $67,000 Bitcoin (BTC) has once again come under pressure. The world’s largest crypto is trading 1.79% down at $61,169 with a market cap of $1.156 trillion.

But despite this, the general news and optimism around Bitcoin remain high. Valkyrie Investments, which launched its Bitcoin futures ETF last week on Friday, has filed for a second futures-based Bitcoin fund.

On Tuesday, October 26, Valkyrie filed an application with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a leverage Bitcoin futures ETF. dubbed as the Valkyrie XBTO Levered BTC Futures ETF, the new Bitcoin fund will trade under the ticker BTFX. As per the filing, the fund will deliver leveraged returns at 1.25x on the Bitcoin reference point.

Leverage Can Serve A Dual-Edge Sword

Valkyrie’s leverage Bitcoin futures ETF will list on Nasdaq and would be able to hold derivatives such as futures and options. Last week while launching the first Bitcoin Futures ETF, Steven McClurg, chief investment officer at Valkyrie said that although the spot Bitcoin ETF approval might take some time, there are some creative ways to work around this. Speaking of the development, Eric Balchunas, an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence said:

“I’m not shocked issuers are already onto leveraged products — this is what happens when you have a hit. What’s intriguing about this one is it’s 1.25-times, which is like Diet Coke — it’s really minor.

We all know tracking Bitcoin using futures has a roll cost so not only will this attract traders who might want a little extra pop, but it’s possible if Bitcoin goes on a run, that little bit of leverage could offset the roll cost. On the flip side, if there’s volatility, it will likely corrode the returns medium and long term.”

The Spot bitcoin ETF Coming soon?

However, McClurg expects the spot Bitcoin ETFs to arrive by November or early next year. With such optimism around a major rally in the BTC price by the end of the year can’t be neglected.

Advertisement

30% Increase of NEAR Token Price and Raising $800 Million Protocol

0
30% Increase of NEAR Token Price and Raising $800 Million Protocol

NEAR token’s latest price rally comes in the wake of NEAR Protocol’s announcement of raising $800 million developer fund.

Brief Market Analysis of NEAR Token

NEAR token price rallied higher on Oct. 25 following NEAR Protocol announcing that it has earmarked $800 million for new funding initiatives aimed at growing its decentralized finance capabilities.

Notably, the price of NEAR token increased by more than 30% to over $12 a token, the highest level since Sept. 9. Combined with the gains recorded in the previous 96 hours, NEAR was up by nearly 39%.

At the time of writing, the price of the NEAR coin is $12.14 USD with a 24-hour trading volume of $810,943,857 USD. NEAR Protocol however, is up 30.41% in the last 24 hours. According to CoinMarketCap, market cap is at $6,389,142,571 USD, and having a circulating supply of 526,072,613 NEAR coins and a max. supply of 1,000,000,000 NEAR coins.

What the $800 Million Funding Means For DeFi

As at Monday October 25, there was a total value of $247 billion locked across all decentralized finance DeFi projects, and NEAR just like many others, are moving to capitalize.

The smart contract ecosystem NEAR Protocol, having earmarked $800 million for new funding initiatives is looking to grow its decentralized finance capabilities.

The new funding includes in part, a $350 million grants program that was announced by Proximity Labs a week ago. This part will give developers the extra motivation and support they’ll be needing to create new product offerings on NEAR, announced the company.

Another $250 million will be allocated to existing ecosystem developers, another $100 million for startup grants, which NEAR is reportedly planning to fund about 20 startups at the rate of $5 million each. Lastly, the remaining $100 million will be pumped into regions across Europe, Asia and the United States.

Implication for NEAR Token

Over the past year, value locked in DeFi protocols has seen a 936% surge. And now, Ethereum’s main competitors like Solana, Binance Smart Chain, and Avalanche presently seeing considerable imcreases, according to data from DappRadar. However, Ethereum-based projects account for about 66% of the entire value locked across DeFi, according to industry data.

Now, despite the unarguable dominance of  Ethereum in the DeFi space, the market keeps growing at an unimaginable rate, currently valued at over $247 billion. This reality undoubtedly gives enough room for other competing platforms to take advantage of.

Although NEAR represents only a small portion of the total DeFi market, but that might just change soon enough.  There’ll definitely be many more developers hoping to tap into the new funding campaigns, even as users continue looking for alternatives to Ethereum-based protocols.

Advertisement

SHIB Network Spikes is a Bullish Signal so It Fails to Return to $0.000045

0
SHIB Network Spikes is a Bullish Signal so It Fails to Return to $0.000045
  • Shiba Inu fails to return to $0.000045 but is holding above $0.00004.
  • The number of new and activity addresses on the SHIB network spikes is a bullish signal.

Since the weekend session, Shiba Inu has been a top for discussion in the cryptocurrency space, especially on social channels like Twitter. The meme-based coin enjoys massive support from the vibrant community, who want nothing but to see it hitting hundreds of percentages in gains every week.

Shiba Inu nearly hit $0.000045 during the weekend rally, outpacing its older ‘cousin’ Dogecoin. Despite Elon Musk sticking with DOGE and calling it the currency of the people, SHIB kept the uptrend intact. The Tesla billionaire also clarified that he did not own any SHIB tokens and the only crypto assets he currently holds are Bitcoin, Ethereum, and his favorite DOGE.

Shiba Inu Seeks Higher Support To Keep The Uptrend On Track

Following the massive upswing to areas very close to $0.000045, Shiba Inu retreated and secured support at $0.000035. An immediate reflex recoil occurred, sending the Dogecoin spinoff above $0.00004.

Nonetheless, Shiba Inu is yet to close the distance at $0.000045 but trading at $0.000041 at writing. Support at $0.00004 is expected to come in handy and aid the bulls in stopping the potential pullback to $0.000035.

Meanwhile, the MACD shows that buyers still have the upper hand, especially with the momentum following tool far above the mean line. A buy signal has also been sustained. If this technical picture remains unchanged, I expect Shiba Inu to gain traction above $0.000045 gradually.

SHIB/USD Daily Chart

SHIB/USD price chart
SHIB/USD price chart by Tradingview

It is worth mentioning that overbought conditions contributed to the pulldown of the token, as the retreating RSI. As the index drops from the overbought area, the odds favor the bears, resulting in a more extensive correction.

The token’s network activity has been on an upward roll based on on-chain data by IntoTheBlock. Realize the number of new addresses created on the Shiba Inu protocol recently spiked to roughly 29,000 while the number of active addresses per day shot up to 57,000.

Shiba Inu Network Growth Model

Shiba Inu Network Activity
Shiba Inu Network Activity by IntoTheBlock

This increase in network activity is a bullish signal. It shows that buyers have the potential to sustain the uptrend, at least for the near term.

Advertisement

Ether outperforming and Bitcoin Move

0
Ether outperforming and Bitcoin Move

Ether has been outperforming other top cryptocurrencies over the past week ahead of an upgrade that will help its affiliated network become faster and more energy-efficient.

The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency has risen about 10% since Oct. 19, while Bitcoin has dropped close to 3%, as of 8:35 a.m. in New York on Tuesday. Ether has also outperformed alternative digital tokens like Binance Coin and Cardano over the period.

Ether has been outperforming Bitcoin in recent days
  

The gains come ahead of an upgrade due Wednesday that is expected to make the Ethereum network faster and more scalable, and could lead to lower fees for users. Ether has soared almost 1,000% in the past 12-months — outstripping Bitcoin’s 380% jump — in part because of the network’s popularity for applications like decentralized finance and non-fungible tokens. 

Like other cryptocurrencies, Ether is prone to big swings and lost more than half its value earlier this year, before recovering. It traded around $4,200 on Tuesday.

Bulls are also using the options market to position for a potential Ether futures exchange-traded-fund announcement, crypto liquidity provider B2C2 wrote in a recent report.

“The dollar value of Ethereum futures open interest rising to where Bitcoin was in July indicates that ETFs tracking the No. 2 crypto should be a matter of time,” said Bloomberg Intelligence strategist Mike McGlone in a report Monday. “ETF providers have been discouraged by the SEC from launching products on Ethereum, but futures trading, demand-pull forces and competition suggest its inevitability.”

Advertisement

Valour Uniswap exchange-traded product fully backed

0
Valour Uniswap exchange-traded product
DeFi Technologies (CNW Group/DeFi Technologies, Inc.)

Valour Uniswap ETP, with UNI as the underlying asset, launches on the Boerse Frankfurt Zertifikate AG stock exchange.

Valour, a Zurich-based exchange-traded products (ETP) issuer, announced the launch of a fully backed investment product to increase exposure to Uniswap decentralized exchange’s native token, UNI.

The UNI token serves as the underlying asset within the Valour Uniswap ETP offering available as a fully backed passive investment product. The Uniswap ETP was launched on a European stock exchange named Boerse Frankfurt Zertifikate AG, the Frankfurt Stock Exchange co-owner.

Valour CEO Diana Biggs highlighted the inaccessibility of blockchain-based investment products on traditional markets and stock exchanges. Speaking about Valour Uniswap ETP’s position in making decentralized finance investments available via mainstream investment channels, she said:

“Uniswap ETP will provide investors with the opportunity to gain exposure to areas of innovation, in particular to decentralized finance.”

As of Monday, Valour’s assets under management offerings grew over 3,000% in 2021, surpassing $290 million from trading on traditional stock exchanges. The Uniswap protocol has passed $500 billion in total trading volume since November 2018.

A Cointelegraph report from Oct. 19 credits Uniswap’s layer-two volumes surge to high transaction fees on the Ethereum blockchain.

Hayden Adams, founder of Uniswap, estimated that Uniswap v3 processed daily volumes worth $115 million across the Arbitrum and Optimism smart contract networks.

According to crypto market data provider Nomics, Uniswap v3 drove $80 million in volume on Arbitrum and roughly $14 million on Optimism during that timeframe.

Advertisement

CryptoWhale’ Story

0
CryptoWhale’ Story

Here is how ‘CryptoWhale’ — or ‘WhaleCircle’, ‘BitHades’, ‘CryptoWelson’, ‘WelsonTrader’, ‘ParrotCapital’, ‘CryptoRandy’, ‘Bitmanny’, ‘RoryCapital’ or Jacob — has been using 3 strategies to earn money on Crypto Twitter. Don’t trust; verify.

Strategy A: Build a complex web of 12+ accounts and 34+ usernames, which are regularly renamed, swapped, … banned and reborn. [A1]

The Twitter profile of ‘CryptoWhale’ says that he signed up in January 2011. But has he been ‘CryptoWhale’ all along? Of course not. And is that account the only one that its owner controls at a given time? Not by a long shot! [A2]

The account that is ‘CryptoWhale’ today (and has been since January 18, 2020, with at least one interruption for a few days in July 2020), actually had the username ‘satosheye’ in the first two weeks of January 2020 and the username ‘JacobKinge’ in December 2019. [A3]

As ‘JacobKinge’, it listed the website ‘jacobking’ dot ‘org’. As ‘satosheye’, it used the display name ‘Jake K’ and claimed to be from Germany. Then, as ‘CryptoWhale’, it listed first ‘Germany’, then ‘USA’, and the websites ‘whalestreet’ dot ‘ca’ and ‘cryptowhale’ dot ‘org’. [A4]

At this point, we know that ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘satosheye’. [A5]

What about that short interruption on ‘CryptoWhale’ in July 2020? Well, for a few days, another account used the username ‘cryptowhale’. (Twitter ignores the case in usernames.) [A6]

It had surely been the same owner, because it took the username and gave it back to the other account within just a few days. But there’s always plausible deniability to some degree, where you can claim your account had been hacked (and perhaps restored by Twitter). [A7]

But, of course, there’s more to that ‘cryptowhale’ account from July 2020: It went on to use the username ‘CryptoWhale_’ for at least 3.5 months, and was finally renamed to ‘2805×6’. We’ll see many more ‘2805x’ accounts later, connected to various other known usernames. [A8]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×6’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale_’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘satosheye’. [A9]

We also know that today’s ‘CryptoWhale’ is today’s ‘WhaleCircle’. Both still exist. We know this because both accounts are open about the fact that the latter is the backup account for the former. And, again, the latter has a longer history as well. [A10]

What has been ‘WhaleCircle’ since May 2020 or earlier was named ‘PolarGiveaways’ from November 2019 or earlier to January 2020 or later. Before that, around April 2019, the account was named ‘Bitmanny’. [A11]

‘WhaleCircle’ listed ‘Missoula, MT’ as his location and also used the display name ‘CryptoCircle’ for some time. And ‘PolarGiveaways’ hosted a ton of … giveaways. You guessed it. [A12]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×6’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale_’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A13]

Earlier, we learned that ‘satosheye’ turned into ‘CryptoWhale’ on January 18, 2020. But guess what, the username ‘Satosheye’ (again, case-insensitive) was immediately used by another account, who kept it for at least 10 months. [A14]

That other ‘Satosheye’, in February 2021 or earlier, turned into … ‘JacobKinge’. Yes, we know Jacob already. Usernames are constantly reused in this scheme. The account was named ‘JacobKinge’ until May 2021, when it became … ‘JacobOracle’. Another Jacob. [A15]

Before becoming ‘Satosheye’ and turning into the two Jacobs, that account had the username ‘SinkTrader’, around January 2020, and claimed to be from ‘Hong Kong’. [A16]

The two months before, in November and December 2019, the account was already named ‘satosheye’ once. Yes, this name has been recycled by the owner as well. But this ‘satosheye’ claimed to be from ‘El Paso, TX’ or just ‘Texas, USA’. [A17]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×6’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale_’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘JacobOracle’ = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘SinkTrader’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A18]

Oh, there’s another account using the two Jacobs’ usernames. And that is the ‘JacobKinge’ we know today. From November 2020 or earlier to February 2021 or later, that ‘JacobKinge’ was named ‘JacobOracle’ as well. He claimed to be from Canada this time. [A19]

The ‘SinkTrader’ username we’ve seen being used around January 2020 has also been used again by another account, just two months later: From March 2020 or earlier to April 2020 or later, ‘SinkTrader’ has been used by an account that had at least 6 other usernames: [A20]

From October 2018 or earlier to November 2018 or later, the account used the username ‘giveawaykeyy’. In early July 2019 or even before, the username ‘cryptowelson’ was used, with the display name ‘Welson H.’. [A21]

Later in July 2019 until August 29, 2019, the account switched to the username ‘WelsonTrader’, with the display name now just ‘Welson’, but claiming to be from ‘Chicago, IL’. [A22]

On August 30, 2019, the account was back at ‘CryptoWelson’, still with the display name ‘Welson’, but alternating between the locations ‘Chicago, IL’ and ‘California, USA’. It advertised the two Telegram groups ‘t’ dot ‘me/WelsonGroup’ and ‘t’ dot ‘me/GriffinTrading’. [A23]

Between January 2020 and November 2020, the account switched to ‘CryptoRandy’ as its username. At least in December 2020 and January 2021, the account was using ‘FoxContest’. And between January and June 2021, the account took its final name ‘2805×1’. Another ‘2805x’. [A24]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×1’ = ‘2805×6’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘CryptoRandy’ = ‘CryptoWelson’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale_’ = ‘FoxContest’ = ‘giveawaykeyy’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘JacobOracle’ = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘SinkTrader’ = ‘WelsonTrader’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A25]

At least two of the usernames we already know have been used by yet another account, which was using a total of 8+ usernames. It all started with the username ‘giveawaykeyy’ (that we already know) from August 2018 or earlier until September 2018. [A26]

From October 2018 or earlier to December 2018 or later, the account took the identity ‘Jim_turnerr’, with the matching display name ‘Jimmy Turner’. From June 2019 or earlier to August 2019 or later, the account was known as ‘GiveawayKingg’. [A27]

From August 2019 or later to November 8, 2019, the account’s username was ‘MeekoTrades’. From November 9, 2019, to January 2020 or later, the account was known as ‘bitrandy’, with display name ‘Randy’, location ‘Portugal’ and Telegram group ‘t’ dot ‘me/raccoonworld’. [A28]

What followed in the succession of usernames for this account from March 2020 or earlier to October 2020 or later was the infamous … ‘BitHades’! Its display name was sometimes just ‘Hades’ (sometimes also fully uppercase). [A29]

In this ‘BitHades’ period, the account advertised at least two Telegram groups: ‘t’ dot ‘me/harveygroup’ and ‘t’ dot ‘me/hadesgang’. There was at least one interruption around June 2020 for a ‘2805x’ username that we already know: ‘2805×1’. [A30]

From December 2020 or earlier to March 2021 or later, the account’s last known username was then ‘RoryCapital’. [A31]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×1’ = ‘2805×6’ = ‘BitHades’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘bitrandy’ = ‘CryptoRandy’ = ‘CryptoWelson’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘FoxContest’ = ‘giveawaykeyy’ = ‘GiveawayKingg’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘JacobOracle’ = ‘Jimturnerr’ = ‘MeekoTrades’ = … [A32]

… = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘RoryCapital’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘SinkTrader’ = ‘WelsonTrader’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A33]

Now, there are more connections from the ‘PolarGiveaways’ that we know: Around August 2019, the username was used via an account that was also known as ‘PaxonXBT’ from September 2019 or earlier to March 2020 or later, and who was allegedly from ‘United Kingdom’ or ‘USA’. [A34]

In the ‘PaxonXBT’ period, there was at least one interruption again: around November 2019 for the ‘BullOfBitcoin’ username. Around March 2020, the identity ‘PaxonTrades’ followed, and later ‘2805×5’, now at least the third ‘2805x’ username. [A35]

At this point, we know that ‘2805×1’ = ‘2805×5’ = ‘2805×6’ = ‘BitHades’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘bitrandy’ = ‘BullOfBitcoin’ = ‘CryptoRandy’ = ‘CryptoWelson’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘CryptoWhale_’ = ‘FoxContest’ = ‘giveawaykeyy’ = ‘GiveawayKingg’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘JacobOracle’ = … [A36]

… = ‘Jim_turnerr’ = ‘MeekoTrades’ = ‘PaxonTrades’ = ‘PaxonXBT’ = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘RoryCapital’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘SinkTrader’ = ‘WelsonTrader’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A37]

At least the third time that ‘PolarGiveaways’ occurs is around September 2019, with another account that was using the identity ‘ParrotCapital’ from November 2019 or earlier to January 2020 or later. It advertised the Telegram group ‘t’ dot ‘me/parrotgroup’. [A38]

Considering that we have met three ‘2805x’ accounts so far, there is yet another small set of accounts that has three additional ‘2805x’ usernames. And there is more evidence that the accounts are connected: [A39]

On his website ‘cryptowhale’ dot ‘org’, our well-known ‘CryptoWhale’ wrote articles as … the mysterious ‘JohnRoberts2805’. So that ‘2805’ really seems to have some significance to ‘CryptoWhale’. [A40]

And, as mentioned before, ‘CryptoWelson’ advertised the Telegram group ‘t’ dot ‘me/GriffinTrading’. And the other set has some ‘Griffin’ as well. Now that’s a very strong ‘2805’ connection and a weak ‘Griffin’ connection. Let’s complete the final connections: [A41]

‘WallyCharts’, then ‘griffincharts’, and finally ‘2805×2’ is one account. ‘CryptoAzure’ and ‘2805×4’ is another. And ‘OrcaFdn’ with a hiatus as ‘2805×7’ is the last one. [A42]

After all, we now know that ‘2805×1’ = ‘2805×2’ = ‘2805×4’ = ‘2805×5’ = ‘2805×6’ = ‘2805×7’ = ‘BitHades’ = ‘Bitmanny’ = ‘bitrandy’ = ‘BullOfBitcoin’ = ‘CryptoAzure’ = ‘CryptoRandy’ = ‘cryptowelson’ = ‘CryptoWhale’ = ‘FoxContest’ = ‘giveawaykeyy’ = ‘GiveawayKingg’ = … [A43]

… = ‘griffincharts’ = ‘JacobKinge’ = ‘JacobOracle’ = ‘Jim_turnerr’ = ‘MeekoTrades’ = ‘OrcaFdn’ = ‘ParrotCapital’ = ‘PaxonTrades’ = ‘PaxonXBT’ = ‘PolarGiveaways’ = ‘RoryCapital’ = ‘satosheye’ = ‘SinkTrader’ = ‘WallyCharts’ = ‘WelsonTrader’ = ‘WhaleCircle’. [A44]

For these accounts, especially the most popular ones, having ‘login issues’ and being suspended by Twitter has been the obvious result of all this. See tweets 1341252096461574144 or 1280558380646649864 by ‘CryptoWhale’ or tweet 1349826600041394178 by ‘WhaleCircle’. [A45]

‘CryptoWhale’ has had his own Discord channel named ‘WhaleStreet’ (tweet 1264760988521377794 by ‘CryptoMotusX’ and tweet 1270012507902693376 by ‘k_filippop’). [A46]

And their own Telegram group was named ‘CryptoWhale’s Telegram Group’, available at ‘t’ dot ‘me/WhaleStreetx’ (tweet 1278631799816630272 by ‘CryptoWhale’, referenced in his profile in early October 2020, and on ‘cryptowhale’ dot ‘org’ in early March 2021). [A47]

Others have tracked the accounts of the ‘CryptoWhale’ web before, and were right about a lot of things: ‘reddit’ dot ‘com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/lyey8f/ivebeentrackingthesefakecryptofundtrading/’ [A48]

Strategy B: Grow an audience quickly, for free, with at least 18 fake giveaways as ‘CryptoWhale’ (totalling more than 315,000 USD) and at least 16 fake giveaways from 5 connected accounts (totalling more than 1,340,000 USD), each in one of two currencies (BT or RP). [B1]

Sep 2, 2019: ~48,787 USD (5 BT) in tweet 1168780413113982976 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) Sep 18, 2019: ~20,496 USD (2 BT) in tweet 1174308501230931969 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) Oct 2, 2019: ~12,481 USD (50,000 RP) in tweet 1179594085138669568 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) [B2]

Oct 3, 2019: ~12,673 USD (50,000 RP) in tweet 1179872679043764224 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) Oct 11, 2019: ~17,171 USD (2 BT) in tweet 1182907677803978753 (as ‘PaxonXBT’) Oct 20, 2019: ~7,998 USD (1 BT) in tweet 1185928492883632128 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) [B3]

Oct 24, 2019: ~7,510 USD (1 BT) in tweet 1187495920792932357 (as ‘PaxonXBT’) Nov 9, 2019: ~17,619 USD (2 BT) in tweet 1193332462660833281 (as ‘bitrandy’) Dec 4, 2019: ~36,601 USD (5 BT) in tweet 1202338256819380224 (as ‘CryptoWelson’) [B4]

Dec 25, 2019: 1,000 USD (~0.1365 BT) in tweet 1209879107447795712 (as ‘bitrandy’) Jan 18, 2020: ~26,782 USD (3 BT) in tweet 1218593942142251008 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Jan 21, 2020: ~86,590 USD (10 BT) in tweet 1219760381280706560 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B5]

Jan 27, 2020: ~23,053 USD (100,000 RP) in tweet 1221941427451547648 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Feb 4, 2020: ~46,464 USD (5 BT) in tweet 1224841158104272896 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Feb 24, 2020: ~89,294 USD (9 BT) in tweet 1231967766350942210 (as ‘Satosheye’) [B6]

Mar 8, 2020: ~445,411 USD (50 BT) in tweet 1236878064115535872 (as ‘BitHades’) Mar 11, 2020: ~23,730 USD (3 BT) in tweet 1237813344695975938 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Mar 15, 2020: ~260,054 USD (50 BT) in tweet 1239254117567979520 (as ‘BitHades’) [B7]

Mar 16, 2020: ~15,389 USD (100,000 RP) in tweet 1239554817015590912 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Apr 3, 2020: 200,000 USD (~29.4230 BT) in tweet 1246033330002411522 (as ‘BitHades’) Apr 10, 2020: ~146,076 USD (20 BT) in tweet 1248640748376993793 (as ‘BitHades’) [B8]

Apr 27, 2020: ~7,679 USD (1 BT) in tweet 1254844387844112384 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Jun 13, 2020: ~18,961 USD (2 BT) in tweet 1271796966188552194 (as ‘Satosheye’) Jul 6, 2020: ~9,073 USD (1 BT) in tweet 1280193851811127298 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B9]

Jul 11, 2020: ~4,639 USD (0.5 BT) in tweet 1281913449229017089 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Aug 27, 2020: ~1,149 USD (0.1 BT) in tweet 1298968508366290947 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Sep 3, 2020: ~830 USD (3,000 RP) in tweet 1301505221202513928 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B10]

Sep 23, 2020: 1,000 USD (~0.0949 BT) in tweet 1308742533745446913 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Oct 5, 2020: ~745 USD (3,000 RP) in tweet 1313093681382068224 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Oct 29, 2020: 1,000 USD (~0.0754 BT) in tweet 1321820971456671746 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B11]

Dec 22, 2020: ~5,168 USD (10,000 RP) in tweet 1341396142274334727 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Dec 24, 2020: 800 USD (~0.0344 BT) in tweet 1342179196962021376 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) Jan 25, 2021: ~16,143 USD (0.5 BT) in tweet 1353734379114139648 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B12]

Feb 9, 2021: ~44,766 USD (100,000 RP) in tweet 1359159354272940035 (as ‘CryptoWhale’) [B13]

Strategy C: Profit financially by recruiting ‘clients’ and making them transfer funds to be managed by a supposed ‘professional’, and offering ‘private mentoring’ in one-on-one conversations via DM/chat, usually on Telegram or Discord. [C1]

The most elaborate way the various Twitter identities described before have been trying to make money is by actually accepting real money from ‘clients’ and pretending to ‘manage’ it for them as in a (real) fund. [C2]

The two identities ‘CryptoWelson’ (supposedly the ‘CEO’) and ‘ParrotCapital’ (the ‘fund’) recruited ‘investors’ via a Telegram group named ‘ParrotCapital — CryptoFund’, available at ‘t’ dot ‘me/parrotgroup’ (or in preview at ‘t’ dot ‘me/s/parrotgroup’). [C3]

The investment ‘prospectus’ available at ‘t’ dot ‘me/parrotgroup/20’ or ‘t’ dot ‘me/parrotgroup/36’ has been telling investors: ‘To join our fund, we do require a minimum investment of 0.20 BTC.’ [C4]

On December 30, 2019 (document ‘20’), that would have been roughly 1,500 USD as a minimum investment, and on January 11, 2020 (document ‘36’), it would have been about 1,600 USD. The ‘fund’ advertised ‘Average monthly returns: 13.5%’ or ‘We Average 13.5% Monthly Profits’. [C5]

In January 2020, the ‘fund’ claimed to be managing more than $7,000,000 (‘AUM’) for ‘investors’. See tweet 1213353897290608640 by ‘ParrotCapital’. For evidence on the minimum investment, see tweet 1213299145068425219 by ‘ParrotCapital’ or the Telegram group. [C6]

Entering was easy, via a PDF form shared on Telegram via Google Drive: ‘Once you’re done the form, you are successfully invested into ParrotCapital’. The cost, if your capital was actually returned, was supposed to be ‘a 2% management fee, and a 5% performance fee’. [C7]

Another ‘fund’ that’s very likely to be connected is the ‘BitShore Crypto Fund’, available at ‘t’ dot ‘me/BitKrabs’ (or in preview at ‘t’ dot ‘me/s/BitKrabs’). [C8]

That second ‘fund’ made even bolder claims: ‘You can withdraw at any time you’d like. Theres also a small 9% profit fee, so you won’t ever be at a loss. My monthly profits change alot but range upwards of 100%!’ [C9]

Entering was just as easy, and the ‘fund’ used screenshots as contracts: ‘If you’re interested, send any amount for me to trade and profit, and than send a screenshot so I can confirm who sent it and how much was sent!’ [C10]

‘CryptoWelson’ was defending against critics and claiming to be in the process of ‘paying back investors’ around January 2020 (when ‘AUM’ allegedly reached $7M). See, for example, tweet 1218448056925900801 by ‘CryptoWelson’. [C11]

Moreover, ‘cryptowelson’ admitted to (and, in a way, claimed) having customer funds in his Binance account, which he could allegedly not access anymore. See tweet 1217938132164722688 by ‘cryptowelson’. [C12]

Apart from that crypto investment ‘fund’, ‘CryptoWhale’ has been offering a paid newsletter on ‘getrevue.co’ for $10 per month. That’s fine. But he has allegedly ‘always donated the proceeds to charity’. See tweet 1405277974060888066 by ‘CryptoWhale’. [C13]

Another (quite obvious and simple) way the various identities have been trying to make money is via ‘1 on 1 private mentoring’ on Telegram and Discord. See, for example, tweet 1245110802236964866 by ‘JoshMcGruff’. [C14]

As a payment for that mentoring opportunity, the accounts asked, in one example, for ~6,500 USD per year. This could be a good deal. But it’s usually fraud if you claim having ‘turned many people into millionaires from my mentorships’. [C15]

Another tactic was to just ask people in an informal way to manage their (crypto) assets for them and trade on their behalf, without setting up a ‘fund’. See, for example, tweet 1402780374351089664 by ‘42Chainlink42’ or tweet 1394078287564091395 by ‘thecryptomonk’. [C16]

That tactic is also detailed here: ‘medium’ dot ‘com/@robswc/people-give-100–000-worth-of-crypto-to-a-raccoon-on-twitter-who-then-proceeds-to-immediately-6c24bf87979 [C17]

Yet another tactic may have been selling a fake (trading) bot that could allegedly predict crypto prices. See tweet 1086759386264018944 by ‘thecryptomonk’. [C18]

Of course, bragging about how rich and successful you are is always part of the game if you want to lure in naive ‘investors’. See, for example, tweets 1215056173457477632 or 1394247566347456516 by ‘CryptoWhale’. [C19]

You don’t believe anyone actually fell for this? Don’t believe ‘CryptoWhale’ and other identities have had many loyal followers? They did (and still do), and their followers even helped him get his account back after it was suspended. Just search for ‘0188312210’ to see. [C20]

Some victims, critics or observers have supposedly contacted law enforcement already. See, for example, tweet 1125418336966168576 by ‘Socal_crypto’. But those various identities, accounts, and also deletions, certainly make things harder. [C21]

You can believe the denials (e.g. tweets 1262743278098583552, 1312928000766341120, 1242367754021277697 and 1286422034575171590 by ‘CryptoWhale’) and ignore his attacks against critics, or you can believe the facts and demand a response. Don’t trust; verify. [C22]

Advertisement

Why Litecoin is popular?

0
Why Litecoin is popular?

While Litecoin is a promising digital currency, the primary question remains: will it succeed in the long run?

In the world of cryptocurrencies, Litecoin is one of the most popular ones out there. The primary reason behind Litecoin’s popularity is its peer-to-peer payment system. This means that you can send money to anyone, anywhere in the world, without incurring any fees from third parties. 

Litecoin has been around since 2011 and is one of the oldest cryptocurrencies still used today. This blog post will answer some of the common questions about Litecoin.

How Does Litecoin Work?

Litecoin is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency and open-source software project released under the MIT/X11 license. It was launched in 2011 by former Google employee Charlie Lee. Litecoin was designed to be an improved version of Bitcoin with lower transaction fees. 

The Litecoin network generates 4 times as many coins like the Bitcoin network. It also has a much higher maximum number of coins.  With these features, Litecoin creators are hoping to make Litecoin appeal more to merchants than miners, which will help reduce volatility because transactions won’t rely so heavily on speculation.

Bitcoin vs. Litecoin

Bitcoin and Litecoin are different forms of currency. Despite their similarities, there are quite a few significant differences between these two cryptocurrencies, which could make one more attractive than another, depending on your needs or goals.

  1. Litecoin stands out because it generates blocks four times faster than Bitcoin. 
  2. Another key difference is that Litecoin uses Scrypt as its hashing algorithm instead of SHA-256 like Bitcoin does. The mining process for Litecoins also differs from Bitcoins in that it uses scrypt instead of SHA-256 algorithm, making it easier to mine on less powerful equipment. However, it is more difficult to compete against big players who have expensive ASICs hardware.
  3. Bitcoin also has higher transaction fees, which is not ideal for small purchases like buying coffee at Starbucks. 

Risks Associated With Litecoin

Litecoin was created as a Bitcoin alternative with limited utility, faster transaction times, and lower transaction fees. However, many more cryptocurrencies have been launched since then that are better for specific uses, such as purchasing goods online or transferring money.

These alternatives offer more significant benefits than Litecoin because they’re safer and more practical than risking your investment in something so volatile.

Recently, Litecoin has gained a reputation as not being as sophisticated or innovative as Bitcoin. Its founder, Charlie Lee, who, during the era of the crypto bull market in December 2017, sold all his Litecoins out of fear that it could cause a conflict of interest. Others viewed him doing so just for signaling how long-term success didn’t really matter.

How To Buy Litecoin

If you are interested in buying Litecoin, consider the following steps:

  1. Find an exchange that offers Litecoin trading.
  2. Register for an account at the said exchange.
  3. Deposit funds into their corresponding wallet.
  4. Buy Litecoin using USD or whichever currency is accepted by the exchange.
  5. You can now withdraw your LTC from the exchange back into your personal wallet.

Final Word

While Litecoin is a promising digital currency, the primary question remains: will it succeed in the long run? Will people adopt it as a form of payment or keep it for investment purposes?

There’s no doubt that Litecoin offers some significant advantages. But, one thing that’s clear from our research is that many factors are at play, and we can’t answer this with certainty. 

We know that people buy Litecoin for a variety of reasons. In case more individuals purchase Litecoin for investment purposes or use it as transferable funds, its value will likely increase.

Litecoin is also available on several major exchanges, which helps users purchase LTC with their traditional currencies, such as USD and EURO.

Advertisement